Comunique-se‘s top headline: journalists at the Folha de S. Paulo are being hired as “administrative assistants” in order to get around existing labor laws, critics say.
This information was confirmed by the vice-president of the Senate Press Committee, journalist Fábio Marçal, who also sits on the ethics council of the federal district journalists union.
Comunique-se has seen documents proving the irregularities in hiring practices. In these papers, the newspaper alleges the practice to be a normal one. “I am not sure whether they do this to get around the law or to bust the union, but it’s absurd,” said Marçal.
The committee referred to is the body that accredts journalists to cover the Senate. The bureaucratic routine is a mile long.
Marçal said only two cases have come to light, but believes other professionals have suffered the same treatment.
Marçal also appears regularly on Rádio Guiaba.
Lincoln Macário Maia, president of the federal district union of journalists, also see the situation as absurd. “It’s absurd. It demonstrates how quick newspapers like the Folha are to denounce irregularities, but pay no attention to dirty deeds going on right under their noses,” he said.
Maia recalled the case of another company which he says engaged in the same violation. “Bloomberg also disguises the hiring of journalists as administrative personnel. These so-called “inovações,” these crude practices dressed up as models of sophistication, create precarious working conditions for journalists,” he said. Bloomberg had no comment on the accusation.
Bloomberg openings occasionally cross my virtual desktop, and are generally for traditional reportorial or editorial gigs, with an occasional “content manager” thrown in.
A much worse practice is requiring contributors to obtain a CPNJ — that is, to constitute a business firm — that is then hired on a contract basis by the publication, with tax and intellectual property ownership advantages to the publication.
Last week, federal lawmaker Paulo Pimenta (PT-RS), author of the bill that would bring back the requirement that journalists earn four-year diplomas as a condition of practicing the profession, protested the Folha’s practices. Also a journalist,he said that such irrregularities were alread being committed at any number of publication, with a tendency to increase. “This is a clear sign that removing the diploma requirement has undermined job security,” he said.
I have never quite understood this insistence on a four-year degree. Everyone I know who has done well in journalism — from CNN to the New York Times — obtained a four-year liberal arts degree and learned journalism through the traditional apprentice system: you start out writing the police blotter in West Covina and then rise to the level of your incompetence.
After all, all that is needed to be a decent journalist is a working familiarity with English and some rudimentary critical thinking skills.
But we are not in Kansas anymore, Toto, as I never tire of saying.
In other press news,
The Ongoing group, owner of the daily Brasil Econômico, is pondering whether to launch a national general newsweekly to compete with Veja (Abril), Época (Globo) and IstoÉ (Editora Três). The initial investment would be some $40 million.
That according to Relatório Reservado. Judging from the BE, however, this would be quite a stretch. The paper, while well-designed, still seems thin and understaffed relative to competitors like Valor, a Globo-Folha JV.
All I can say is that oligopolies that rule the Brazilian media, and this is why the job market is as draconian as it is, and why the Brazilian journalist is in such a precarious position when it comes to collusion with unethical practices.
Filed under: Brazil, Intellectual Property, Journalism, Legal Affairs, Life in Sambodia, Media, Outsourcing | Leave a comment »